He performance was not outstanding but I do not believe it was bad. Finally, I would like to add that even though I have heard that some disliked Sofia Coppola's performance. Overall, I have to say that I enjoyed this movie more than The Godfather II. As a result, he questions his means.especially considering the fact that his children have chosen different paths. Here.we can see a different side, the one of a lonely man.one that in spite of his power can never be in peace and doesn't seem to get anything he wants no matter what he does. Governed by his ego and desires of revenge. Michael is presented as emotionless, controlling, obsessive, and ruthless. In The Godfather I and II his character was all negative.
I believe the performances were good, and I enjoyed seeing the other side of Michael Corleone.here we see that he was after all human, although he never regretted what he did.
The plot is different and it may be perceived as forced and lame.Yet when located in the right context it does make sense. Thus, there was a need to think in a new storyline that was also engaging but could survive without those old characters. At first, one may not feel very connected with this movie because the absence of those characters that we learnt to love in those 2 previous 'The Godfather'.but I think we all know the reasons why they were not there. It is important to emphasize, however, that this film has merit by its own. At first, one may not feel very connected with this movie because the absence of those characters that we learnt to I know this movie has been subject of harsh criticism, especially when compared to the previous two. I know this movie has been subject of harsh criticism, especially when compared to the previous two.
0 kommentar(er)
